dc.contributor.advisor | Bustamante Cabrejo, Alexander | |
dc.contributor.author | Rivera Montero, Ana Sophia Betzabe | |
dc.creator | Rivera Montero, Ana Sophia Betzabe | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-08T14:07:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-08T14:07:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/33412 | |
dc.description.abstract | Determinar la validez diagnóstica del score predictivo preoperatorio de
ASGE frente al score CHISHOLM para coledocolitiasis en pacientes diagnosticados de
colecistitis litiásica en “Hospital De Alta Complejidad Virgen De La Puerta – EsSalud”.
Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, analítico, retrospectivo de
tipo prueba diagnósticas en pacientes con colecistitis litiásica atendidas en el Hospital
De Alta Complejidad Virgen De La Puerta – EsSalud” en el periodo enero del 2019 a
diciembre del 2023. Se registró de las historias clínicas a todos los pacientes con
Coledocolitiasis diagnosticados por colangioresonancia magnética, siendo evaluados
con ambos scores predictores de Asge y Chisholm, para así poder distinguir cual score
tiene mayor predicción.
Se analizó la sensibilidad, la especificidad, el valor predictivo positivo, el valor
predictivo negativo de ambos scores predictores.
Resultados: Participaron 225 pacientes con Colecistitis Litiásica, de los cuales 32
(14.2%) tuvieron coledocolitiasis por colangioresonancia magnética. La
sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo y negativo del score predictivo
preoperatorio de coledocolitiasis de la ASGE en pacientes con colecistitis litiásica es
90.6%, 46.70%, 81.77% y 65.91% respectivamente. La especificidad, la sensibilidad,
valor predictivo positivo y negativo del score predictivo preoperatorio de coledocolitiasis
de Chisholm en pacientes con colecistitis litiásica es 82.20%, 70.90%, 88.16% y
60.27% respectivamente, tras comparar ambos resultados observamos que mayor
Índice de validez la obtuvo Score Chisholm con 79,11% asimismo la razón de
verosimilitud positiva más alta la obtuvo el score Chisholm con 2,83%. Las
variables intervinientes asociadas al diagnóstico de coledocolitiasis fueron: el diámetro
colédoco según ecografía mayor o igual a 6 mm (p < 0,05), el sexo femeninoen un
62.5% (p <0,05).
Conclusiones: El Score CHISHOLM tiene mayor validez de pronóstico que el Score
ASGE para el diagnóstico de coledocolitiasis en pacientes con colecistitis litiásica. | es_PE |
dc.description.abstract | To determine the diagnostic validity of the ASGE preoperative predictive score
versus the CHISHOLM score for choledocholithiasis in patients diagnosed with calculous
cholecystitis in ‘Hospital De Alta Complejidad Virgen De La Puerta – EsSalud¨.
Materials and Methods: An observational, analytical, retrospective study of diagnostic test
type was conducted in patients with calculous cholecystitis treated at the ‘Hospital De Alta
Complejidad Virgen De La Puerta - EsSalud’ in the period January 2019 to December 2023.
All patients with choledocholithiasis diagnosed by magnetic resonance cholangiography
were registered in the medical records and evaluated with both Asge and Chisholm predictor
scores, in order to distinguish which score is more predictive.
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of both
predictor scores were analysed .
Results: 225 patients with calculous cholecystitis participated, of which 32 (14.2%) had
choledocholithiasis by magnetic resonance cholangiography.
The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the
ASGE preoperative choledocholithiasis predictive score in patients with calculous
cholecystitis are 90.6%, 46.70%, 81.77% and 65.91% respectively. The specificity,
sensitivity, positive and negative predictive value of the Chisholm preoperative predictive
score for choledocholithiasis in patients with calculous cholecystitis is 82.20%, 70.90%,
88.16% and 60.27% respectively. After comparing both results, we observed that the highest
validity index was obtained by the Chisholm score with 79.11% and the highest positive
likelihood ratio was obtained by the Chisholm score with 2.83%.
The intervening variables associated with the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis were:
common bile duct diameter greater than or equal to 6 mm according to ultrasound (p < 0.05),
female sex 62.5% (p < 0.05) .
Conclusions: The CHISHOLM Score has greater prognostic validity than the ASGE Score
for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis in patients with calculous cholecystitis | es_PE |
dc.description.uri | Tesis | es_PE |
dc.format | application/pdf | es_PE |
dc.language.iso | spa | es_PE |
dc.publisher | Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego | es_PE |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | T_MED_3864 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | es_PE |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | es_PE |
dc.subject | Colecistitis Litiásica | es_PE |
dc.subject | Coledocolitiasis | es_PE |
dc.title | Validez diagnóstica de los predictores clínicos preoperatorios de asge y chisholm para coledocolitiasis en pacientes con diagnóstico de colecistitis litiásica del hospital Alta Complejidad Virgen de la Puerta | es_PE |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis | es_PE |
thesis.degree.grantor | Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego. Facultad de Medicina Humana | es_PE |
thesis.degree.name | Medico Cirujano | es_PE |
thesis.degree.discipline | Medicina | es_PE |
dc.subject.ocde | https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.27 | es_PE |
renati.advisor.orcid | https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4260-8933 | es_PE |
renati.author.dni | 70246191 | |
renati.advisor.dni | 42230181 | |
renati.type | https://purl.org/pe-repo/renati/type#tesis | es_PE |
renati.level | https://purl.org/pe-repo/renati/level#tituloProfesional | es_PE |
renati.discipline | 912016 | es_PE |
renati.juror | Lozano Peralta, Katherine Yolanda | |
renati.juror | Luján Calvo, María del Carmen | |
renati.juror | Valencia Mariñas, Hugo David | |
dc.publisher.country | PE | es_PE |