Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBustamante Cabrejo, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorRivera Montero, Ana Sophia Betzabe
dc.creatorRivera Montero, Ana Sophia Betzabe
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-08T14:07:21Z
dc.date.available2024-07-08T14:07:21Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/33412
dc.description.abstractDeterminar la validez diagnóstica del score predictivo preoperatorio de ASGE frente al score CHISHOLM para coledocolitiasis en pacientes diagnosticados de colecistitis litiásica en “Hospital De Alta Complejidad Virgen De La Puerta – EsSalud”. Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, analítico, retrospectivo de tipo prueba diagnósticas en pacientes con colecistitis litiásica atendidas en el Hospital De Alta Complejidad Virgen De La Puerta – EsSalud” en el periodo enero del 2019 a diciembre del 2023. Se registró de las historias clínicas a todos los pacientes con Coledocolitiasis diagnosticados por colangioresonancia magnética, siendo evaluados con ambos scores predictores de Asge y Chisholm, para así poder distinguir cual score tiene mayor predicción. Se analizó la sensibilidad, la especificidad, el valor predictivo positivo, el valor predictivo negativo de ambos scores predictores. Resultados: Participaron 225 pacientes con Colecistitis Litiásica, de los cuales 32 (14.2%) tuvieron coledocolitiasis por colangioresonancia magnética. La sensibilidad, especificidad, valor predictivo positivo y negativo del score predictivo preoperatorio de coledocolitiasis de la ASGE en pacientes con colecistitis litiásica es 90.6%, 46.70%, 81.77% y 65.91% respectivamente. La especificidad, la sensibilidad, valor predictivo positivo y negativo del score predictivo preoperatorio de coledocolitiasis de Chisholm en pacientes con colecistitis litiásica es 82.20%, 70.90%, 88.16% y 60.27% respectivamente, tras comparar ambos resultados observamos que mayor Índice de validez la obtuvo Score Chisholm con 79,11% asimismo la razón de verosimilitud positiva más alta la obtuvo el score Chisholm con 2,83%. Las variables intervinientes asociadas al diagnóstico de coledocolitiasis fueron: el diámetro colédoco según ecografía mayor o igual a 6 mm (p < 0,05), el sexo femeninoen un 62.5% (p <0,05). Conclusiones: El Score CHISHOLM tiene mayor validez de pronóstico que el Score ASGE para el diagnóstico de coledocolitiasis en pacientes con colecistitis litiásica.es_PE
dc.description.abstractTo determine the diagnostic validity of the ASGE preoperative predictive score versus the CHISHOLM score for choledocholithiasis in patients diagnosed with calculous cholecystitis in ‘Hospital De Alta Complejidad Virgen De La Puerta – EsSalud¨. Materials and Methods: An observational, analytical, retrospective study of diagnostic test type was conducted in patients with calculous cholecystitis treated at the ‘Hospital De Alta Complejidad Virgen De La Puerta - EsSalud’ in the period January 2019 to December 2023. All patients with choledocholithiasis diagnosed by magnetic resonance cholangiography were registered in the medical records and evaluated with both Asge and Chisholm predictor scores, in order to distinguish which score is more predictive. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of both predictor scores were analysed . Results: 225 patients with calculous cholecystitis participated, of which 32 (14.2%) had choledocholithiasis by magnetic resonance cholangiography. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the ASGE preoperative choledocholithiasis predictive score in patients with calculous cholecystitis are 90.6%, 46.70%, 81.77% and 65.91% respectively. The specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive value of the Chisholm preoperative predictive score for choledocholithiasis in patients with calculous cholecystitis is 82.20%, 70.90%, 88.16% and 60.27% respectively. After comparing both results, we observed that the highest validity index was obtained by the Chisholm score with 79.11% and the highest positive likelihood ratio was obtained by the Chisholm score with 2.83%. The intervening variables associated with the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis were: common bile duct diameter greater than or equal to 6 mm according to ultrasound (p < 0.05), female sex 62.5% (p < 0.05) . Conclusions: The CHISHOLM Score has greater prognostic validity than the ASGE Score for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis in patients with calculous cholecystitises_PE
dc.description.uriTesises_PE
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_PE
dc.language.isospaes_PE
dc.publisherUniversidad Privada Antenor Orregoes_PE
dc.relation.ispartofseriesT_MED_3864
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_PE
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es_PE
dc.subjectColecistitis Litiásicaes_PE
dc.subjectColedocolitiasises_PE
dc.titleValidez diagnóstica de los predictores clínicos preoperatorios de asge y chisholm para coledocolitiasis en pacientes con diagnóstico de colecistitis litiásica del hospital Alta Complejidad Virgen de la Puertaes_PE
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesises_PE
thesis.degree.grantorUniversidad Privada Antenor Orrego. Facultad de Medicina Humanaes_PE
thesis.degree.nameMedico Cirujanoes_PE
thesis.degree.disciplineMedicinaes_PE
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#3.02.27es_PE
renati.advisor.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4260-8933es_PE
renati.author.dni70246191
renati.advisor.dni42230181
renati.typehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/renati/type#tesises_PE
renati.levelhttps://purl.org/pe-repo/renati/level#tituloProfesionales_PE
renati.discipline912016es_PE
renati.jurorLozano Peralta, Katherine Yolanda
renati.jurorLuján Calvo, María del Carmen
renati.jurorValencia Mariñas, Hugo David
dc.publisher.countryPEes_PE


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess